Talk:Jan Lokpal Bill/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Modify Lead to reflect current status of the bill?

I think it is now necessary to modify the Lead (specifically the last para) to state that the parliament has passed the bill as a direct result of the nation-wide agitation lead by Anna Hazare. And that the next step is for a standing committee to examine it, etc. --MK 10:29, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Except that's not what happened. Parliament didn't pass the bill. Parliament passed a motion to have the bill considered by the committee so that the protests would stop. The bill may never actually pass parliament; even if it does, it may not in any way resemble any of the current versions. So, yeah. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:BalajiThemis Consultants.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:BalajiThemis Consultants.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 10 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Jan Lokpal on Avaaz

There is a Jan Lokpal petition in www.avaaz.org (since the 3rd Jan, the page says):

[http://www.avaaz.org/en/lokpal_worst_politician_awards/?vc Jan Lokpal on Avaaz]

Is this relevant enough to warrant mention on the page itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.45.141 (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Unless the petition itself is famous or has been reported in the media, I think not. Even if it is, no links. Just a mention. The link tends to fail the external link policy Lynch7 13:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)