Talk:James Bond 007: Blood Stone/Archive 1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Soetermans in topic Cliffhanger

Sequel

Some information which is sourced has been added regarding the next James Bond Video Game and the possible sequel to James Bond 007: Blood Stone. Smokeyfire--Smokeyfire (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Character Page,List of characters in Blood Stone 007

Could someone please expand this page List of characters in Blood Stone 007

--Smokeyfire (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Smokeyfire --Smokeyfire (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Title

The official title of the game is 007: Blood Stone. Could the page be changed accordingly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmybondy007 (talkcontribs) 20:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

That is its actual name, even on the box and official website. I'll change it. Charlr6 (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Actually, thats strange. It says that someone did move it to 007: Blood Stone in June. I don't know why the page still has James Bond at the beginning. I don't know why it is doing that.Charlr6 (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Bond 007: Blood Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Cliffhanger

Hi @Shimbo:,

I didn't consider it uninteresting, it's that mi6community.com is not a reliable source and gives too much attention to a fan theory. Fan speculation is not notable. To be notable, it will need reliable, third-party coverage. So yes, it will need to be notable to be included. Perhaps you can find a reliable source, otherwise I'll leave it up to you to undo your revert. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC) soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

It's also what @331dot: removed here. Fan speculation is just that: fan speculation. It'll need a reliable source. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)