Talk:Jagdgeschwader 11/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article never should have been promoted to B-class. Many paragraphs needs cites, page numbers often do not support the fact that they are supposed to reference, badly needs a copy-edit, etc.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   see above

   B. MoS compliance:

   References need publishing locations, lede too short

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Page 80 of Caldwell and Muller only references initial formation and locations, but is cited nearly a dozen times.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   No discussion of poorly-trained pilots arriving in 1944 or of tactics used to offset Allied numbers, if any. No examples of numbers available vs. opposition's numbers

   B. Focused:

   Insufficient discussion of JG 11's operations in the context of the Air Defense of the Reich. No apparent use of Prien's definitive history of JG 1 and 11. No use of the relevant volumes of Prien's Der Jagdfliegerverbände der Luftwaffe.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: