Talk:JBoss Seam
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editI don't think the Gavin King mentioned in this article it linked to the "correct" Gavin King.... 62.181.214.178 (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
A historical reference to Red Hat
editJBoss is a division of Red Hat. But to state this without any historical context may suggest to some readers that Red Hat may be somehow responsible all the great work that the JBoss team did before Red Hat purchased it. I think the nature of the relationship could be made more clear by changing the text to something like "...now a division of RedHat..." Astonzia (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Then go for it and make the change... --PhilipMay (talk) 10:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Not up to Wikipedia standards
editI think the beginning of this article should be more elaborate in answering the "What is it?" question. E.g. be more specific.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on JBoss Seam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927005922/http://docs.jboss.com/seam/ to http://docs.jboss.com/seam/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)