Talk:Júrame (Gisselle song)/GA2

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs)) 18:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

I will go through with this review now! --K. Peake 18:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • The studios in the infobox should not use the term studio as part of their names in it; please remove this from both of them
  Removed -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Instead of ballad version next to the pop genre, please add a note signifying this
  Comment: A footnote? -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • merengue should not be capitalized in the infobox
  Fixed -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Does [1] mention the meaning of "Swear to Me" title at all? If so, write this out in the first section please.
  Comment: Yes, the source corroborates the meaning of "Swear to Me", do you mean to say that it should also be noted in the infobox -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "The song was recorded as" → "It recorded as" and add a comma followed by "respectively" at the end to establish these were two separate recordings
  Done Did minor adjustments, but stuck to the syntax -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Comment: I think the SQUO piping is better as it makes sense to wikilink the actual ceremony, but I relocated 2001 in front to better clarify it taking place in 2001 -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Background and composition edit

  • Img looks good!
  • Wouldn't Grammy be more appropriate linking to the ceremony it received this award at?
  Comment: Not sure what's meant by this, but I wikilinked it to Grammy Awards and used that in prose -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "had a vote a confidence" → "had a vote of confidence"
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a full stop for the Voy a Enamorarte sentence
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "penned most of the album's tracks including" → "penned most of the tracks, including" and add a full-stop after the title please
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion and reception edit

  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "either version of the song stating" → "either version of the song, stating"
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "of Tropical/Salsa Track of the Year but" → "of Tropical/Salsa Track of the Year, but"
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "the United States as well as its subcharts" → "the United States, as well as its subcharts of"
  Done -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Charts edit

  • Good

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this looks really good only a few things to do! --K. Peake 19:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    As always, I'll get to work on this on Sunday or Monday. Erick (talk) 15:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Magiciandude Just to notify you, I went ahead and already implemented some of the changes, as marked above, feel free to contest or change the content as needed, and congrats on going through the GAR process, and good luck! -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks @Dcdiehardfan for taking care of the rest and thank you Kyle for reviewing this! Let me know if I have missed anything. Erick (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Magiciandude and Dcdiehardfan, thank you for your work on this. Regarding the unresolved change where a comment had been left, the year 2001 in the lead should be linked to the relevant Grammys ceremony in my opinion. --K. Peake 20:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake Of course! I tried to fix the Wikilink concern in the Lede, is it good now? Dcdiehardfan (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
     Pass now; not quite what I was aiming for in the lead but this was altered now! --K. Peake 21:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply