Talk:Iron oxide nanoparticle

wrong reference

could not find the ref in the "Molecular Imaging" journal. Page number does not exists (starts with 1536 in 2011).

Böhm I.A rapid and user-friendly method to quantify the iron content after magnetic cell loading with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.Molecular Imaging 2011;10:270-277

I couldn't find it with a Google Scholar search either. I have replaced it with another citation. Thanks for pointing this out. RockMagnetist (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

"Nanoworm" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nanoworm. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 15#Nanoworm until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – bradv🍁 05:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

It's frustrating that no Wikipedia entry exists for nanoworms (not even a redirect), because scientists aren't prone to defining the word when they use it (and they are still using it); so, it's hard to figure out what they actually are. If there had been a Wikipedia article, we might not have that conspiracy theory about nanoworms today (search for nanoworms on duckduckgo.com to find it prominently featured). Here are some links about nanoworms that I think are sufficient to merit an article, personally:

• https://phys.org/news/2021-09-coating-technology-nanoworms-covid-.html
• https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/archive/newsrel/science/05-08Nanoworms.asp
• https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2015.299

Yeah, it's not defined very well, but scientists apparently seem to know what it means enough to not bother explaining themselves.

75.174.127.97 (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)