Talk:Ionic compound/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by North8000 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


I'm starting a Good Article review of this article

edit

I'm starting a Good Article review of this article. North8000 (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I always like to ask this early, is there someone here who would be involved on behalf of the article? Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
@North8000: yes, I'm around as nominator. Thanks for reviewing. --99of9 (talk) 22:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Cool! North8000 (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA criteria final checklist

edit

Well-written

edit
Passes this criteria. What an excellent job! Does far better at informing the reader than a typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic. The sentences are written so that they natively make clear informative statements, and without having to research the internal links. North8000 (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Factually accurate and verifiable

edit
Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 11:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Broad in its coverage

edit
Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

edit
Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

edit
Passes this criteria. North8000 (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Illustrated, if possible, by images

edit
Has 9 images, all either are in public domain or have suitable licenses. North8000 (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Passes this criteria. Images are well-chosen to enhance the coverage of the topic. North8000 (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit

Couple of spelling tweaks? I think that the article is in US English but includes "polarised" and "neutralise". I would have changed but wasn't sure. North8000 (talk) 11:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article.

edit

Congratulations, this article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Compared to an typical Wikipedia article on a technical topic, this is very well written and does a better job at explaining a technical topic. Excellent work! North8000 (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply