Talk:Inverse-variance weighting

Confusing symbols in the Multivariate case section edit

The notation used in the section on the multivariate case is quite confusing, in the that the   is used to indicate both a sum and a covariance matrix. Additionally, the symbol   is used to denote a covariance matrix, whereas in the rest of the article is used to mean variance.

I have boldly edited the equations to use the more common symbol   for covariance matrices. The older formulae are retained below.


  of the individual estimates  :

 
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glopk (talkcontribs) 16:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Derivation from maximum likelihood? edit

Let there be a set of   measurements  , each with uncertainty  , of a variable  . A "gaussian" probability distribution function of   with respect to each measurment is:

 

The log-likelihood of   given the measurements, (  could be multiplied with -1, doesn't matter):

 

Finding   that maximizes likelihood should give the "best" estimator of the weighted-mean of the   values, taking the uncertainties into account:

 

So then, from the above the "best"   is:

 

Decomposing the variance of  , we get:

    Blakut (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply