Talk:Into the Crevasse/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Sources aplenty!
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Most sources check out fine, but ref numbers 5 through 8 are from the Internet Movie Database, which is a user-generated website; I'm a bit uncomforable with this, considering that the IMDb isn't considered reliable from my expierience, any reason why they should be accepted?
- IMDb cannot be used as a source to back up any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs), the trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions, etc., but I removed them. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Most sources check out fine, but ref numbers 5 through 8 are from the Internet Movie Database, which is a user-generated website; I'm a bit uncomforable with this, considering that the IMDb isn't considered reliable from my expierience, any reason why they should be accepted?
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Only one copyrighted image; has the apporpriate tags.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- So far, nice work. Just need one thing sorted out really, then hopefully, I'll pass it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- OK, now that the issue has been addressed, I can now pass the article. Good job! -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing the article. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- OK, now that the issue has been addressed, I can now pass the article. Good job! -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- So far, nice work. Just need one thing sorted out really, then hopefully, I'll pass it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: