Talk:Interstate 84 in Utah/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Looks good.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a caption for the map would be a good addition, otherwise all is good here.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I'm passing since I'm confident that the prose will be touched up quickly. The comment about a future ACR hold though. Imzadi 1979 → 03:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Lead
- "The highway enters Box Elder County near Snowville before becoming concurrent with I-15 in Tremonton before traveling south through Brigham City and Ogden." That could be split up or reworded to get rid of " ... before ... before ... "
- Fixed. --AdmrBoltz 03:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- RD
- "This is expressed in terms of average annual daily traffic (AADT), a measure of traffic volume for any average day of the year." I've found it's better to just pipe a link in the next sentence along the lines of In 2012, UDOT calculated [[average annual daily traffic|on average]] that ..." than to try to add a quick explanation of AADT.
- My personal preference is to spell it out a bit more clearly. --AdmrBoltz 03:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- In general, there are some prose things I'd copy edit if this article were going to ACR, but for GA, I'm ok leaving them. I'll make an offer now to help c/e pre-ACR actually.