Talk:Interstate 476/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Examples include "a reduced design built due to local environmental concerns", "8 miles (13 km) south of the toll barrier" (sentences should not begin with a numeral, rather, it should be spelled out).

   B. MoS compliance:

   Introduction is too short, and does not sufficiently summarize the article, please see WP:LEAD for more info. Article also includes "peacock terms" such as "bisecting the famous Main Line at U.S. Route 30, where the highway is adorned with such visual roadside treats".

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Some paragraphs are lacking citations.

   C. No original research:

   Unreferenced statements may contain original research.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Article will be placed on hold until issues can be addressed. If an editor does not express interest in addressing these issues within seven days, the article will be delisted.--ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I have made some improvements to the article including expanding the lead and rewriting the route description a bit. Dough4872 (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

It looks good, what happened to the control cities? I think its been improved enough, thanks to User:Dough4872 and User:Spikebrennan. I'm impressed. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)