Talk:Interstate 470 (Missouri)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi 1979 → 22:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

DABs and ELs are good.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Watch that some things (BYP US 71) are abbreviated without being spelled out, but other wise the prose is fine.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I'm planning on editing the svg for the map tonight for you. The background shouldn't be transparent, which makes it look funny in the infobox

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Things look fine. I'd suggest you sweep through to double check abbreviation usage though. Imzadi 1979 → 00:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)