Talk:International human rights instruments
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2A03:2880:32FF:10:0:0:FACE:B00C in topic Life orintation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International human rights instruments article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nomination edit
I have nominated the 99 Percent Declaration by the Occupy movement. Dualus (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- God, you're exporting the POV-push campaign all over the place. Note that the sources seem to reject the idea that this document be associated with the "Occupy" movements. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- It certainly meets the definitions. Do you think [1] (audio) could be related? Dualus (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Take a step back from your soapbox for just a moment and notice that every single other "Declaration" on that list issued from a major international organization such as the UN. The authors of the "99% Declaration" can't even get a bunch of hippies to vote on their "Declaration". Removed again. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the removal from factchecker, their is no common concensus among the occupy movement. Therefore human rights is not neccessarily a priority/platform for the group and should therefore not be included.Millertime246 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- As do I. Even if sources did say that the Occupy Movement is united around this, (which they don't) there is still no justification for the demands of a group of protesters somehow being put in this document. The idea is beyond absurd. Trusilver 21:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the removal from factchecker, their is no common concensus among the occupy movement. Therefore human rights is not neccessarily a priority/platform for the group and should therefore not be included.Millertime246 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Take a step back from your soapbox for just a moment and notice that every single other "Declaration" on that list issued from a major international organization such as the UN. The authors of the "99% Declaration" can't even get a bunch of hippies to vote on their "Declaration". Removed again. Centrify (f / k / a FCAYS) (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- It certainly meets the definitions. Do you think [1] (audio) could be related? Dualus (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hell, no.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Which is which edit
Dear Writers,
Classification point, Which conventions belong to UN general assembly and which conventions belong to international human rights law .
While in fact and at the end they are all laws belonging to human rights but as soon as this classification mentioned I would like to know .
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Atef Ezz (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Life orintation edit
Critically duscuss three human rights instruments
Life orintation edit
Critically duscuss three human rights instruments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:2880:32FF:10:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)