Wikipedia

Talk:Inside No. 9/Archive 1

< Talk:Inside No. 9
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Archive 1
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Inside No. 9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Interactive episode

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can somebody explain it to me? I've read through it and I just don't get it. 92.15.54.22 (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

Latest comment: 9 years ago11 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Inside No. 9/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this...

  • "As is typical of Shearsmith and Pemberton's work" their names should in full and wikilinked here
  • "The pair returned to writing macabre stories, according to Shearsmith, as they", think this could be rephrased
  • Digital Spy published the overnight rating for Episode 3 as 1.00m; same figure given by a forum member on the ratings thread.
    • I'd rather avoid Digital Spy, but it seems better than no source at all. Good find. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • "Quiet Night In" was a change in approach, relying on physical comedy,[63] but it was well-received as funny" well received shouldn’t be hyphenated here because it follows a noun.
    • I'll take your word for it! J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • "lower than the slot average of 970,000 (5.1% of the audience)...............The series low was the fifth episode, "The Understudy", which attracted 720,000 viewers (4.1% of the market), is there a difference, or do they both mean audience share?
    • Linked audience share and changed for consistency. I was just trying to avoid repetition, but clarity is more important! J Milburn (talk)
  • "Inside No. 9 was also nominated for Best TV Sitcom at the 2014 Freesat Awards,[91] which celebrate the best of free British television”, Free-to-air for clarification
  • Ref 50 was published in The Guardian, not theguardian.com

Very comprehensive and enjoyed reading this. No dead links or dabs and could find no close-paraphrasing issues. Pictures are fine. Will pass once comments have been addressed. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your review and kind words. I have made the changes you suggested. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Everything's in order; shall pass. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot- this completes my topic! J Milburn (talk) 21:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Inside_No._9/Archive_1&oldid=1087085818"