Talk:Indian Camp/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Truthkeeper88 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Prose is good, complies with essential details of MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Those that are on-line, OK, assume good faith for off-line sources, sufficiently referenced, no signs of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Hemingway was on a train, returning from New York to Toronto, during Hadley's labor. Presumably Hadley is Hemingways' wife or lover but needs a little more explanation.   Done
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No edit warring
  3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  4. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    One small point to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks for the quick response, I am happy to pass this as a GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks! Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply