Talk:Index of waste management articles

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kortoso in topic List format

Untitled commnet

edit

High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program was removed from the list because it creates only wastes which have already been listed - diesel exhaust, garbage, sewerage, paper, etc. Even if you assume the place is an evil government conspiracy, radio waves aren't waste to be managed!!! Long before HAARP ends up on this list, the Pentagon and Sears Tower belong here. John Elder 07:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Index of waste management articles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

List format

edit

I fixed the list, which was using incorrect format.

  • In addition there may be a few or several topics that don't really belong here.
  • There also seems to be a British emphasis to the topics chosen here; it would be good to see some balance arise.
Kortoso (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply