Talk:Impression Prods., Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc.
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 173.48.179.247
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A large part of the commentary here is about the Fed Circuit decision, and refers to things like 'strengthens patent rights' or other language. The FedCircuit decision was reversed, so the commentary is outdated. Why not delete the commentary that addresses only the (now reversed) Fed Circuit decision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.179.247 (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)