Talk:Impax Asset Management Group

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Impax Asset Management Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140915162559/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-27/impax-targets-wind-with-450-million-renewables-fund-chief-says.html to https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-27/impax-targets-wind-with-450-million-renewables-fund-chief-says.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412010712/https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/forests.aspx to https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/forests.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Advert tag

@DGG: I have have heavily trimmed the quotes which did look a bit like advertising. Please feel free to trim anything else you want to. I think you said back in December "I think it can be tightened a little, and I may do it." If there is anything you have in mind please can you go ahead so that we can remove the tag. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC) Dormskirk first thing I notice, though not exactly promotionalism , but the history section is a collection of misc minor events. DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

DGG I have now trimmed some of the miscellaneous minor events (which I had intended would provide some critical analysis about the company). I the context that there is no longer "promotionalism" are you OK to remove the tag? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)