Talk:Image frequency
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cuddlyable3 in topic Article explanation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Image frequency redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editIf
Images are produced in every receiver. They are recognizable as a duplicate of the legitimate signal,
typically offset by 21.4, 21.6, or 21.7 MHz (twice the intermediate frequency--I.F.) from the actual
frequency, depending upon the scanner.
which I found on the net, is talking about the same thing, then it sure isn't too clear. Jidanni 20:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text hereInsert non-formatted text here</nowiki>
Article explanation
editI think that the explanation in the article is incorrect. Do I have to present a proof?
TomyDuby (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- I also see that it is wrong. Will you fix it TomyDuby? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 20:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think that I can.
- TomyDuby (talk) 04:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have fixed some more. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)