Talk:Iguana Girl/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Link20XX in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 20:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to review this one too. Link20XX (talk) 20:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Just needs a few things before it can be promoted:

Checklist

edit
  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

edit

Lede and infobox:

  • The genres in the infobox need to be sourced.
    • Done.

Production:

  • To resolve her familial trauma, sought to create a manga series that would allow her to make peace with her parents something about this sentence doesn't make sense, maybe add "she" or "Hagio" after the comma.
    • Revised.
  • The Anime News Network article on Fantagraphics' licensing of the series doesn't say they released it in 2010 specifically, just that they licensed it
    • Additional soruce added.

Reception:

  • In source 21 and 22, Natasha, Inc needs to be tagged as the publisher to Comic Natalie. Source 22 also needs to be tagged as a Japanese language source.
    • Done.

That is all. Address them and I will pass it. Link20XX (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply