Talk:I Need You (album)/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:LeAnn Rimes - I Need You.jpg

Image:LeAnn Rimes - I Need You.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

UH?!?! Yeah it does. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 20:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LeAnn Rimes-I Need You (Album Cover).jpg

Image:LeAnn Rimes-I Need You (Album Cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ineedyou leannrimes.jpg

Image:Ineedyou leannrimes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ineedyou reissue leannrimes.jpg

Image:Ineedyou reissue leannrimes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Release date - Should it be the 2001 release or should it be the 2002?

I don't really think it should go by the 2001 release as it wasn't an actual official release as Rimes disowned it stating that it was done without her consent and I read somewhere her lawyer said she didn't have any knowledge of its release till afterwards and I think to post it as a release that isn't official isn't right this album doesn't fall under the other albums that sometimes due this this album had very different circumstances. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 20:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

It was still released in 2001. Whether or not she approved of it, it was still released by her record label. What's unofficial about her record label (which she is signed to) releasing it? They have all the rights to her recordings, so legally, they can do whatever they want with them. — Status {^talk_contribs 20:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Actually no they didn't as she wasn't really under contract with them at the time, she was having a suit against them as well. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 20:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Her recordings still belonged to them. Unless she bought them from the label, for what would be millions of dollars, before the album's release; they still owned them. — Status {^talk_contribs 20:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Well that's the part that confuses me I don't know if she was really under contract with them at the time as she resigned with them. If she was still under contract why did she have to resign with them? At least that's what Mike Curb himself said. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 20:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

• EDIT: After the lawsuit was dropped or settled but either way after all was said and done she resigned her contract with them. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 20:59, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

What does that really matter? We aren't here to decide whether or not she was legally signed with them. May have, may have not; but regardless, it was still released in 2001. We always go by the first release date here on Wikipedia. This should be no different. (Why was it even re-released when she disapproved of it so much anyway?) — Status {^talk_contribs 21:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't think they were really suppose to. Personally, that to me would be wrong to do if you're in court. I bet you that's why they need her permission. It had to do with legalize stuff. I'm not a lawyer but that seems to make the most sense to me. They released the album without permission while in court and that broke her contract with them and that's why she had to resign it. And as for the re-release I bet that was her way of smoothing things over with Curb she is (as me and my boyfriend have discussed) a bit of drama queen. LOL! JamesAlan1986 *^talk 21:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm gonna look around and see if I can find anything about all that and see what was and wasn't suppose to happen. JamesAlan1986 *^talk 21:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

If you can find more info about being in court and the album's release (ie her finding out about it, etc) and it can be made into its own little section, I'd support the use of the 2002 date. But as of now, there isn't any real evidence of the 2001 one being illegal. — Status {^talk_contribs 21:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Here it is when Rimes filed a lawsuit against her label she was asking "that Curb give Rimes the rights to all past recordings and videos, give up all publishing interests in her compositions and destroy all currently available recordings." That was right here on MTV.com JamesAlan1986 *^talk 21:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)