Talk:I Am (Leona Lewis song)/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


I propose to take on this review and will look at the article now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.  — Calvin999 18:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

First reading edit

In general, this article is well-written and altogether satisfactory, and rather better than the other article of yours that I reviewed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • "Lyrically, "I Am" is about how the feelings and emotions Lewis experienced following her departure from her former record label Syco and its boss, Simon Cowell." - This sentence is ungrammatical.
    • I've tweaked the sentence.  — Calvin999 19:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • "Island released the "I Am" on 17 July 2015" - I don't think the "the" is necessary.
  • "The violins were performed" - I don't think the word "performed" should be used.
  • Wikilink - Kobalt Music Group,
  • ""I Am" premiered on BBC Radio 2 on 17 July." - I suggest you add 2015.
  • "download for anyone who who had previously pre-ordered the album" - Repeated word.
  • "However, Michael Clemons of The Daily Reveille thought that while it is not a stand out track, it is a good listen." - All the other comments are in the past tense while this one is in the present tense.

GA criteria edit

  • The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout. 
  • The article uses reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.  
  • The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.  
  • The article is neutral.  
  • The article has recently been expanded by the nominator and is stable.  
  • The single image has a fair use rationale.  
  • Final assessment - I am satisfied with the improvements made during the review and believe this article meets the GA criteria.   Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply