Talk:IOS/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I will give you the benefit of the doubt and not quick fail this nomination. There are several sentences that have no citations/references. Some quick examples that I found:

  • "Since iOS 3.2, users are able to set a background image for the Home screen. This feature is only available on third-generation devices—iPhone 3GS, third-generation iPod touch (iOS 4.0 or newer), all iPad models (since iOS 3.2)—or newer."
  • Most of the "Notification Center" sub-section.
  • Second paragraph in the "Digital rights management" sub-section.

I will place this nomination on hold for a couple days to allow you to find reliable sources for the sentences that are missing references. Afterwords I will continue with a full review.--Dom497 (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Failing nomination since there has been no activity on this review and the article still has some ways to go before being properly ready for a nomination.--Dom497 (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply