Talk:INo Mobile

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Peer Review edit

Strengths edit

The lead section is understandable and succinct, giving a brief yet well-explained description on what INo Mobile is on. The structure is clear as well with the appropriate headings and subheadings. Article is well-substantiated with references for most of the points given. Links given were all valid.

Suggestions edit

An info box can be added to give others a summary of INo Mobile at a glance, and the info box can include information such as the founder, initial release, type and along with the website of INo Mobile in it. The logo of INo Mobile can also be realigned to the top right corner of the article or to be included at the top of the info box if an info box is present.

Section 3.3 and 3.4 of wearable and lifestyle may be unnecessary as a subheading if additional information is not available yet. Mentioning it in passing should be sufficient.

Please be careful of the lines '... is the perfect way to ensure the safety of your loved ones at all times' and 'easy-to-use mobile phone' as they may contain elements of advertisement. Perhaps, the word 'perfect' can be removed or replaced with a more neutral word.

Even though linked keywords are evident in the article, more can be added for keywords such as 'Research and Development' and 'system integration'. This is so as to allow visitors who do not understand the terms to be redirected.

Reference point number 17 is linked to a Facebook page. The page http://pevoli.sg/project-sac can be used instead so as to improve credibility of the article. Wchen020 (talk) 05:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Intro edit

Intro / lead is terrible, horrible English grammar & usage. Just FYI Sadsaque (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on INo Mobile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply