 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
brucella edit
is also an important member of the group --ArazZeynili (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rhizobiales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127030659/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html to http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Outgroup position edit
Two taxa as outgroup(s), and with a common ancestor on same level as Meganema and the rest of Rhizobiales looks very strange (this outgroup isn't really an outgroup per current design of the cladogram). Moreover, AFAIK Sphingomonas belongs in fact to Caulobacteridae, but Magnetospirillum doesn't. Because of the basal position of Magnetospirillum inside Alphaproteobacteriae, the last common acestor of Magnetospirillum and Sphingomonas is also an ancestor of all Caulobacteridae (including Rhizobiales) and of all Alphaproteobacteria. So how can it be corrected? --Ernsts (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)