Talk:Hurricane Carlotta (2006)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cyclonebiskit in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am going to be reviewing this page which is currently up for Good Article Nomination, I will have the full review up within a few hours. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    expand lead, overall copyedit needed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Any Spanish sources?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I am putting this article on hold to allow you to address these points. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since there has been no changes to the article and the nominator has claimed to have retired, I am failing this article. Please address these points before re-nominating the article. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply