Talk:Hunter: The Reckoning (video game)/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Alexandra IDV in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 00:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
"Single-player mode or multiplayer mode" -> "Single-player or multiplayer mode"
Done.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Is there any information on the Uwe Boll film? I assume it was cancelled, any details on that aspect of the production?
Nope, I cannot find anything after how they planned to shoot the film in British Columbia - I'm assuming it was quietly cancelled.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Screenshot rationale needs to be stronger
Oops, this was uploaded by someone else, and I forgot to check the rationale when reworking the article. Fixed.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

That's about it @Alexandra IDV:. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Abryn: I believe I have addressed the issues you brought up.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply