Talk:Human rights in Belarus

Belarus Mid‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on May 9, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If anyone's got anything which opposes some of the claims that are made in this article, or has anything to add for the sections on Protestants and Catholics or the industrial relations side of things in this country, feel free to add them in. I couldn't really find that much information and didn't really have the patience to look at Google for hours :) XYaAsehShalomX 18:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nobody is talking, I am removing the POV tag. Gtbob12 (talk) 00:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Style problems. edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey; just added the tags on the page, as it could do with a bit of editing to make it into less of a chore to read. Sceptre ^(talk) 10:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Human rights in Belarus edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Human rights in Belarus's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "militia":

From Alexander Lukashenko: "'Hundreds of protesters arrested' in Belarus". BBC News. 2010-12-20. Archived from the original on 21 December 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-20. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
From Elections in Belarus: "'Hundreds of protesters arrested' in Belarus". BBC News. 2010-12-20. Retrieved 2010-12-20.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Certain western countries... edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

...such as the United Nations and Human Rights Watch? Really? It's a sign of a good article that the government's own perspective is presented, but it's the sign of a poor one when that perspective starts dictating the titles of sections in the article. I should also add that the "government perspective" section, using what appears to be a single source from the government itself, creates the impression that the UN approves of Belarus, an impression directly contradicted by the information presented later on the UN's attitude (unfortunately not entirely sourced directly from the UN either). It's also directly contradicted by information about the Belarus/UN relationship on the website of Human Rights Watch, the first organization cited in this article and not a western country or any sort of country at all.

I could also get into the fact that there's borderline redundant information presented in favor of the government, or that there's what appears to be original research presented to oppose the UN view by arguing that it's influenced by US geopolitical interests (note the contradiction between accepting the UN when it's presented as supportive as in the first section and rejecting it when it isn't), or the fact that the lead references several critical NGOs but the body has at least one instance where the statement that NGOs are critical of Belarus is marked with "citation needed," or any number of other issues. Suffice to say that the article as currently written needs some work.

The same issues bleed over into the article on Belarus itself, where "western countries" take issue with human rights in Belarus, ignoring the fact that the UN and NGOs (yes, even ones based in western countries) are not themselves western countries, and more importantly ignoring the fact that the whole "it's just the west that has a problem" line is exactly what Belarus's leadership says in its own defense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.214.152 (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Human rights in Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Human rights in Belarus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic