Talk:Human Biodiversity Institute

Latest comment: 2 days ago by Hob Gadling in topic Pseudoscience

SPLC

edit

Regardless of the accuracy of this page, the huge number of Southern Poverty Law Centre references and quotes makes the entire discussion appear biased and unreliable. Who are they and why on earth are their views so important? Needs a rewrite 122.62.143.121 (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

See WP:RS and maybe WP:NPOV. If the SPLC are saying something incorrect or irrelevant, provide feedback. 82.3.251.137 (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pseudoscience

edit

The concept being pseudo-scientific is mentioned several times in the article and quotes but there isn't any explanation as of why. Quotes explain that the theory masquerades as being objective, implying that it isn't, but again without mentioning the reason. Neurotty (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

That is why the sources are linked. The sources have the details. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply