Talk:Hugo Boss/Archives/2012

Advert notice

This notice feels a bit silly. I don't know of many advertisements that point out that a company was founded by a nazi. Niczar ⏎ 14:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Page name

I request that the name of this article is changed to 'HUGO BOSS' instead of 'Hugo Boss'. The company, like many others such as the spelling of eBay or iPod etc chooses to write it's logo like that in all written documentation, employees must write it that way and the press are asked (not always comply) to that presentation too.

HUGO BOSS is a trademark of Hugo Boss, not the actual name. You wouldn't make the title of the PlayStation 3 article PLAYSTATION 3 simply because it's trademarked that way. Examples such as eBay and iPod are part of corporate identity and also serve the purpose of differentiating letters in the name.(Myscrnnm (talk) 17:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC))

If this can be approved I will also change the way the article is written with reference to the sub-brands of BOSS & HUGO again with the capital letters.

The issue is that this article is primarily about the company NOT the person, if it was the person it should most certainly be 'Hugo Boss'. I have no objections to adding AG. --Djkinsella 22:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like a split would be in order: one about the company (HUGO BOSS AG) and one about the person. Daniel Case 15:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes I agree, I don't think I have the "priveleges" to create the pages. Is it necessary to call it HUGO BOSS AG as surely it would be necessary to revise all the fashion company articles to S.p.A's etc. --Djkinsella 18:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hugo Boss logo.svg

Image:Hugo Boss logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Involvement of firm in SS uniform design

Under the section heading Involvement in World War II, the page presently states: The all-black uniform of the Nazi Schutzstaffel...was designed by SS-Oberführer Prof. Dr. Karl Diebitsch and graphic designer Walter Heck. I've added a "citation needed" template, as this line is identical to an unsourced statement on the Karl Diebitsch page. -- Deborahjay (talk) 08:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Axishistory.com user Derek states under http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=59496&p=1286617 that he has found no proof of D.'s involvement in uniforms. Wschroedter (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I did add the source cite long ago to each of the above article pages. The cite for the entry is also currently under the Schutzstaffel article in section: "Special ranks and uniforms". The entry is listed twice on that article page, so I just added the cite to the second place it is mentioned, as well. The cited info. comes from the book: Lumsden, Robin. "A Collector's Guide To: The Allgemeine - SS", Ian Allan Publishing, Inc. 2001, p 53. Kierzek (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

On the other hand, the notion that Hugo Boss designed the uniform seems not only to be unbased on any source, but actually to be impossible: Boss did not receive an RZM license until 1933, after the uniforms in question were in use. I suspect strongly that the Intertubes added 1 and 1 and got 11: since the Boss firm is now known as a "designer," then the old man was a "designer", and thus must have designed Nazi uniforms, etc. Solicitr (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree, Solicitr. It was Diebitsch and Heck who "designed" the black uniform. Kierzek (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Discussion No pictures of Hugo Boss the Nazi founder.

In researching the design of WW2 German uniforms I was struck by the lack of images of Hugo Boss himself. Having failed to find one on this site I went through a lot of other web pages and found one that was not just company images. Why is it so hard to find an historical image of Mr Boss?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hugo Boss (fashion designer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 20:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Red Label

Can someone please post info about Hugo Boss's red label? It seems to be missing. Thanks.