Talk:Horst Wessel/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm on it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, I went through the text on Saturday, but I will check it again in the copyedited form today and write the review asap! Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This is quite a good article with some minor flaws that need to be taken care of:
- In the infobox, you give his "years of service" in the SA. While that is in itself problematic, since the SA is not really a military, but rather a paramilitary organisation, this is not the biggest issue. The years of service 1922-30 cannot be correct, since he was a member of the DNVP from 1922-26.
- Quite right, typo. Is now fixed! Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- The school names are not correct German. Words like Köllnisches or Königsstädtisches are adjectives. The school names are therefore Königstädtisches Gymnasium and Luisenstädtisches Gymnasium (today known as de:Heinrich-Schliemann-Oberschule (Gymnasium)). As for Köllnisches, I cannot make out which school you mean, you should check the correct school name again. If you don't find one, give it as "attended Volksschule in Kölln".
- Well spotted. Also fixed. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I believe this got a little mixed up. I rephrased it a bit, I hope you are OK with that version? Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm totally fine with it. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- I believe this got a little mixed up. I rephrased it a bit, I hope you are OK with that version? Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
review to be continued
- sounds thrilling... :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 11:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- DNVP removal: Where is the "too radical" quote from? Siemens?
- Yup, cited. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- The statement about Schalmeienkapellen today should be sourced.
- Yup, also cited. Like the one above, it's Siemens, just forgot to cite during my initial expansion. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Assassination: According to this newspaper article, Wessel was shot at the door of his appartment by three men. Your written source seems to say two men, but the author of the German article is a history professor. I'll try and check that information later in the library. What should definitely be mentioned is that there apparently was a connection between his rent problems and his murder.
- Longerich also supports the article sentence statement and I added the book cite accordingly. Kierzek (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- From what I can see, Siemens seems to be the expert on the topic anyway, so we can safely take him as a reliable source. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Good job guys. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- From what I can see, Siemens seems to be the expert on the topic anyway, so we can safely take him as a reliable source. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Longerich also supports the article sentence statement and I added the book cite accordingly. Kierzek (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Grave: From what I take from German sources, the grave of Wessel himself was leveled in 1945. His father's grave meanwhile was not levelled until 2013 (see here). It could also be made clearer that the grave became a place of Neo-Nazi rallying after 1990. Also interesting: On 9 November 2011, a leftist group sprayed the Wessel tombstone pink and added the word Keine Ruhe für Nazis! ("No rest for Nazis!"), see here.
- The article currently says his grave was vandalized after World War II, and since the war (in Europe) ended on 2 May, there was still 7 months left of that year where it could have been trashed, so I think the current statement is acceptable. Awesome job in finding the source about the leftist incident, have added that to the article. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- I added another sentence about the grave now being levelled alltogether. Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- The article currently says his grave was vandalized after World War II, and since the war (in Europe) ended on 2 May, there was still 7 months left of that year where it could have been trashed, so I think the current statement is acceptable. Awesome job in finding the source about the leftist incident, have added that to the article. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- There are also some interesting photos one might use in the article, like his father's tombstone.
- I think this file, which I uploaded to this Wiki from Siemens, is rather perfect. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Those seem to be the issues that I could find. If you can address them, it's a pass.
PS: The alleged funeral speech one can find on YouTube is actually a speech by Goebbels in 1933 called 14 Jahre Nationalsozialismus. Just to avoid confusion. The video of his funeral also appears to me as if it's a later work, not actual footage. Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think one YouTube link in the external link section about the Wessel Leib is fine. Furthermore, this statement proves how careful you must be when citing old, historically important event clips on YouTube. In this case, there is no doubt that the current link of course is the actual Wessel Lieb. Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the review mate. Will get right on it tomorrow. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 00:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)- Zwerg Nase, thank you very much for your thorough review. I believe I've repsoned to most of your points. Let me know if there is anything else lieber freund. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Everything seems to be in order now. Congratulations, it is now a good article! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and useful comments. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Everything seems to be in order now. Congratulations, it is now a good article! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Zwerg Nase, thank you very much for your thorough review. I believe I've repsoned to most of your points. Let me know if there is anything else lieber freund. :) Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 13:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
An earlier version of the review in 2009 mentioned a couple of ice plants marking the grave ( for HW and his father) What happened to them? 86.157.200.252 (talk) 22:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)