Talk:Homer vs. Patty and Selma/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

All good, but the plot summary is about 200 words too large. On hold while concern is met. Sceptre ^(talk) 03:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Response

Thank you for doing the GA Review. I have shortened the plot summary subsection by 200 words. Cirt (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Looks way better; passed. Sceptre ^(talk) 16:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)