Talk:Holby City series 1/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Frickative in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I fixed one disambiguation link.diff

Linkrot: No dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    This article is reasonably well written and follows the Manual of Style. I made a few minor copy edits.diff
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The artcile is well referenced, no dead links, references are reliable sources, no dead links
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Broasd, thorough and focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I am happy that this article meets the GA criteria, so am happy to list it. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your review, and also for the copy edit. Some of the typos that had slipped through were shameful, thank you for catching them! Frickative 15:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply