Talk:History of the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs

Fair use rationale for Image:First Premiers.jpg

Image:First Premiers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Premiers 1984.jpg

Image:Premiers 1984.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Grand Final 2004.jpg

Image:Grand Final 2004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Harmful ?

There's an assertion in reference to the point-stripping following the salary cap breach that "The latter action was particularly harmful, as the club were poised to take the Minor Premiership and had won 17 consecutive matches". I suggest that this is not NPOV as it was only harmful if one perceives merit in the club being poised to take the Minor Premiership under these circumstances. One could say that the breach itself was particularly harmful given the 17 consecutive losses that their opponents suffered. Such a comment would of course also be non-NPOV so I shan't make it but I shall remove the existing subjective assessment of what is "harmful". Anyone care ? -Sticks66 10:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope. •Florrie•leave a note• 11:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

2004 Premiers

This section, while also citing no sources and seems out of place as no other seasons are specifically mentioned, reads like a gushing article written for a tabloid paper. As it sticks out of the page for being in a section dealing with eras of the club and incidents of great impact I think it should be removed. If it is moved to the page for the club and out of the history page (after a significant cleanup) fine, but the way it is written and positioned now just makes it strange. What about the other years? If they were added it would be more appropriate but to deal with a single game/leadup to said game when decades of history earlier are dealt with in a couple of sentences is not consistent.

Is it likely that a single fan logged on and decided that the Rape Allegations section needed something positive after it, attempting to make the club look better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanzi (talk • contribs) 05:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140717162122/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html to http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html#1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629005311/http://www.abc.net.au/news/australia/nsw/200402/s1051920.htm to http://www.abc.net.au/news/australia/nsw/200402/s1051920.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070422230115/http://www.bulldogs.com.au:80/teamstore/ to http://www.bulldogs.com.au/teamstore/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314152556/http://www.stats.rleague.com:80/rl/teams/canterbury/canterbury_idx.html to http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/canterbury/canterbury_idx.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)