Talk:Hemp in Kentucky/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Tbhotch in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 16:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
Some citations are not placed where they should be and sometimes they are placed where they shouldn't be
- C. No original research:
- D. No copyright violations:
- A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
- A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
- A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Resolved comments from Tbhotch |
---|
;Lead
|
- Thank you for your review. It will take me some time to do everything (and I may have some help from a related project). For now I've made the changes to the lede as suggested. Is it permitted to add checkmarks to the review section? ☆ Bri (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you can. Although I've collapsed what has been done. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Tbhotch: I hope I got all the citation cleanups, there were quite a few and the numbering changed since your review. I hope that accessdate isn't required for Google Books, but if it is I will add those. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, you can. Although I've collapsed what has been done. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.