Talk:Hemiauchenia

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extinction Low‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Probably paraphyletic?

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

At least according to [this paper], Hemiauchenia is paraphyletic, should this be included in the article? (pinging User:Jpbrenna) --Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

That link is not working for me, but yes, that should at least be mentioned.--Jpbrenna (talk) 15:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:Jpbrenna I think I have got the link working now [[1]] in case the link doesn't work again, the paper is called The Camelidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from the Quaternary of South America: Cladistic and Biogeographic Hypotheses, what do you make of the paper? --Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the link works now. I still can't read the full article, but at least I have the publication info and abstract. I am on my way to a university library as I write this, so I will try to obtain a full copy while I am there. I had already gleaned from other sources that Scherer was the one who proposed that the genus is paraphyletic. In the meantime, if you've already read it, please feel free to expand the article yourself. I have a dentist appointment after I go to the library, and several errands to run afterward. I have already started a new section for its classification history.--Jpbrenna (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic