Talk:Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. I look forward to it and feel free to leave me a message about anything. Best, Sportsguy17 (talk • contribs • sign) 02:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Going over some basics: here is the Checklinks Report, and the Reflinks report. I will be posting a section-by-section analysis shortly. Sportsguy17 (talk • contribs • sign) 00:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

As I begin the section-by-section, I am going to advise you that a snowstorm (known as Nor'easters) is hitting Boston tonight throughout tomorrow and if I lose power, I will be unable to respond for a while. For time purposes, I am only going to mention sections that need improvement, especially regarding sources. If free will beats fate, then I'll check for mechanics (spelling & grammar) later once reference improvements are made.

That's just OK. I hope you'll be OK too. :) Mediran (t • c) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Excellent job. I spent most of my morning shoveling snow off my driveway and walkway, albeit I still have power and so does everyone, so this is good . Anyway, good job. I verified the Plot summary references and no others need to be added. I will be checking all references and checking for spelling and grammar. This looks good so far. Sportsguy17 (talk • contribs • sign) 21:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Section-by-section Analysis

Lead

The lead is looking pretty good overall. The first few sentences of the third paragraph need to be copy edited: For example, change it to The episode was written by Hillenburg, Derek Drymon, and Tim Hill and the animation director was Alan Smart. Otherwise, it seems to follow MOS:LEAD quite well.

Done. Mediran (t • c) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Plot summary

Although this section is about the plot, it could add sources in more details. If the given sources already support the details, use <ref name="..."/> for the duplicates and the original should be <ref name="...">(content of source)</ref> (without the tags of course )

Well, there is currently a source from the DVD. Is that OK or should I have to add more source/s? But I don't think there are other sources more reliable than what is presently written there. Mediran (t • c) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Read-through

This section is well-sourced, but is very short. Either combine it or expand it, since while its not necessarily a requirement per WP:WIAGA, it can be somewhat awkward to read a short section.

I have merged it to the "Release" section. Mediran (t • c) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

This is what I have for now. Lets start here. The article is looking well so far. Sportsguy17 (talk • contribs • sign) 01:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm looking forward to what this is going to be. Thanks again. :) Mediran (t • c) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Final review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Pass! Sportsguy17 (talk • contribs • sign) 00:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much Sportsguy17! :) Mediran (t • c) 04:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)