Talk:Hedonic hunger/GA1
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs)
Obvious/major mistakes/errors edit
There are no large mistakes/errors. There are no {{POW}} or {{unreferenced}} tags, etc.
References edit
There is a sufficient number of references and they are reliable sources.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization edit
This article is well-written and does not contain any spelling, grammar, punctuation or capitalization issues.
Article content: plagiarism, content/comprehensiveness and image use policies edit
There is no plagiarism and the images are correctly licensed. The content broadly covers the subject but doesn't go into great detail except where needed.
Stability and point of view edit
This article is very stable, with no edit wars in all of its history, and is written from a neutral point of view. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01
Overview in all edit
This article is stable, well-referenced, and in general perfect to be a good article. The lead is very short and summarizing, and the article is informative, accessible, of a reasonable length and understandable to everybody. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01