Talk:Hayel Saeed Anam Group
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hayel Saeed Anam Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202225544/http://www.alyemany.com/~hsatest/en/company_contact.php?codecpy=53&cpytype=3 to http://www.alyemany.com/~hsatest/en/company_contact.php?codecpy=53&cpytype=3
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203003433/http://www.hsagroup.com/en/founder.php to http://www.hsagroup.com/en/founder.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Criticism tab edit
I have found an article on The Telegraph about the practices of HSA Group in Indonesia, which have been widely criticised. I explained the arguments and referenced the article, as HSA Group has not responded to the allegations, I have also mentioned that. Why has my edit been reverted twice? Here's what I wanted to add to the article:
Criticism
In 2018, Greenpeace and Aidenvironment claimed to have documented large scale deforestation in areas, which have been given an extra level of protection of deforestation and are controlled by subsidiaries of the Hayel Saeed Anam Group (Arma Foods and Pacific Oils and Fats). Following these accusations, Unilever suspended placement of any new orders from HSA's Group subsidiaries until the allegations have been satisfactorily addressed by them. The HSA Group has not responded to request for comment by The Daily Telegraph. Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/04/26/greenpeace-investigation-claims-palm-oil-supplier-major-brands/
Please let me know the reasons for the revert.
0berbabo1 (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- On reasons for the revert I can only speculate, but WP:DUCK does seem to apply. Just on the off-chance that there is a conflict of interest at work, I have placed an appropriate welcome on the relevant single-issue editor's talk page. Meanwhile I have substituted your text for the vacuous and unreferenced PR stuff previously calling itself an "overview". I'll also keep this page on my watch list for a bit. Sylvia de Jonge (talk) 11:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)