Talk:Hamilton Fish/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cmguy777 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 13:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Things to fix right away
edit- There are five wikilinks to disambiguation pages in this article. Click on the disambiguation link in the toolbox on the right to see what they are and fix them. Fixed Cmguy777 (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- The article has a nice prose style until the end, with what amounts to a trivia section about Fish's relatives. The important information there needs to be converted into prose and get rid of the bullets. Cut out the non-essential trivia and only leave information about relatives directly related to this article. Fixed Cmguy777 (talk) 18:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Quite a good article overall. Just two issues need to be fixed to pass GA review: lead expansion and alt-text for the images.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The only major issue is the lead. It's quite small for the size of the article and doesn't touch on every major section. Make sure that there is at least a sentence for every section. The largest section, about Fish's service as Secretary of State, probably deserves more coverage in the lead than the other sections.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No issues that I see.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Seems comprehensive, though I'm not an expert on the subject. However, as a general reader, I didn't finish the article with any major questions.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No problems here.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images need alt-text.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Good job with the improvements. Article passes GA review.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: