Talk:HMS Hampshire (1903)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   " commander-in-chief of the China Station, to destroy the German radio station at Yap together with" - it seems like that should have been split after "the China Station" and that something like "She was ordered..." should be inserted there.

   I am prone to string a few too many facts into one sentence. Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images both check out.

7. Overall:

   'Not much here to pick on, just that one sentence that reads funny to me. Parsecboy (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.

Looks good, passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)