Talk:HMS Gloucester (62)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 15:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• Grabbing for a review. Miyagawa (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• Design and description: "Gloucester was displaced 9,400 long tons" you can drop the "was"
• Link beam to Beam (nautical)
• Not sure I'm understanding "The ship's complement was 800–15 officers and ratings" - was the complement between 800 and 815, or the crazily unlikely notion that there was 800 officers and 15 ratings?
• Cite #22 needs to be filled out fully.

That's all I've got. Placing on hold. Miyagawa (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

All done. Thanks for doing this so promptly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Great, happy to promote on that basis. Miyagawa (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)