Talk:H. P. Lovecraft (band)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Fair use rationale for Image:Hplovecraft.jpg
Image:Hplovecraft.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
"Less acclaimed" ?
"H.P. Lovecraft was an American psychedelic rock group in the 1960s, later resurrected as Lovecraft for two less-acclaimed albums in the 1970s." Less acclaimed than what? This is clumsily written and should be edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.19.152 (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Use of H. P. Lovecraft template
I have put back the template for H.P. Lovecraft, the author, on this page. They did not simply take his name - they were authorised to do so by his estate, and composed and performed musical interpretations of several of his writings. Hence, in my view, worthy of association with the writer through his template. Ghmyrtle (talk) 06:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)