Talk:Gunther E. Rothenberg/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I'm assuming that the Villa de Madrid is a passenger ship of some sort, but can you clarify please?

   "Rothenberg completed with a bachelor's degree from" doesn't sound right to me. Maybe graduated or something similar instead of completed (or, this could just be a phrase I don't run into writing my Kaiserliche Marine articles ;)

   fixed.

   You should specify what his muzzle-loaders were. Many people would probably know what you're talking about, but many would not.

   I believe keynote is one word (the last paragraph in the Education & Career section).

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   This edit by another editor needs to be either sourced or removed (more than likely just reverted, given the peacock-ery going on there).

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   See the diff linked above.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Are there no pictures available? Since he passed away in 2004, a copyrighted photo of him would qualify for Fair Use. If you can't find a photo, that's no big deal though.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Excellent work on this article, Ruth. There are just a few things that need to be ironed out before I'll pass the article for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)