Talk:Group decision-making
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Delphi and Dotmocracy and other processes?
editDelphi method & Dotmocracy are two examples of prescribed group decision making processes that incorporate some form of voting, but also require other steps. Should these be listed as processes on this page, or do they just fall under voting? I would argue they are worth specifying, considering that consensus decision-making could also be considered a form of 'voting to accept' an idea - but really the value in consensus is in the dedication to dialogue and deliberation before the "vote". --Jason Diceman (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Dictatorship
editIs "Dictatorship" really a formal group decision making system? --85.250.113.89 (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- No it's not. The group is not making the decision. I have removed "Dictatorship". --Jason Diceman (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Overlap between participation articles
editI was looking at the articles on participation, and I noticed that they are not very coordinated and they overlap quite a bit. I'm starting a discussion about this at Talk:Participation#Overlap_between_participation_articles. Any help is appreciated! MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? I think the different subsets of group decision making are included appropriately. I though the inclusion of group decision making at the very end of the article provided both closure and and a great description of the social effects of group decision making. Lbroc001 (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted "Causes"
edit@Shufei Li: I just deleted the "Causes" section you added, since I thought the "Title did not make sense, content had no clear theme and multiple claims needed citation." I also think your edit puts a disproportional emphasis on "Delphi method", and again, there are no references. DougInAMugtalk 16:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Comparative Management Seminar
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2024 and 20 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hiroki terada koko (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Willysandi12.
— Assignment last updated by Willysandi12 (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Hiroki terada koko @Willysandi12 exciting to have you editing and reviewing this page respectively :) Welcome to (this side of) Wikipedia DougInAMugtalk 14:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Unsupported material
editOK, so it's a student project, but you still need to support the broad construct with proper references. The few references there do not support the wider proposition, and a lot of the statements are plain wrong. Given we want to encourage student editors I have just flagged it for the moment but I will make a note to return to it in a week or so and remove material which is not properly referenced