Talk:Grosmont Castle/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 12:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria. I visited this castle as a child and can remember a family game of cricket in what I assume was the ruins of the main hall. A lovely place.

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
My only minor comment is that the capitalisation of "Earl" is inconsistent.
The note on the talk page about the £15 is well made too, this might be flagged up a little more clearly.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply