Talk:Grok (chatbot)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Belbury in topic Redirect of Licence
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Written in Rust edit
The sidebar says "Written in Rust" citing a primary source (https://x.ai/). Is this not contrary to Wikipedia guidelines? Do we not require a secondary source? Tadreidms (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, WP:PRIMARY is fine for
straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge
. It's only when primary sources start getting promotional, contentious or potentially libelous that it becomes a problem. Belbury (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect of Licence edit
The licence redirects to open software wikipedia page I am unable to understand is this a typo or something else , it should redirect to 'apache' wikipedia Steven Willers (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Done, target should have been Apache License. Belbury (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
