Talk:Grey reef shark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This is a wonderfully interesting article. I have no suggestions for improvement to offer. It is excellent. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC) GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Very well written; interesting and clearly presented b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Excellently referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources c (OR): No OR apparent

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers all major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Congratuations! Another great article.

—Mattisse (Talk) 20:57, 9 May 2009 (UTC)