Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I will complete this review within a week. -Riley1012 (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• "As Greece had placed highly at the previous year's contest, it was automatically qualified..." the word "was" isn't necessary
• "...a promotional tour and travel related to contest." add word "the" before contest
• "...announced by ERT on 16 February 2007 as the participants for the national final." change "for" to "in"
• "...mentioned as entrants who were considered, however they were unable to meet..." add comma after "however"
• "...weekly entertainment show Vsichki pred ekrana and was interview by Bulgarian National Radio." should be "was interviewed"
• "According to the Eurovision rules, all participating countries, except the host nation, the "Big Four", consisting of France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom, and the top nine nations with high placements at the previous year's contest, were required to qualify from the semi-final to compete for the final; the top 10 countries from the semi-final then progressed to the final to join them." This is too long for one sentence. I would remove the semicolon and make the part after it a separate sentence.

No MOS issues

2. Verifiable The reference layout is good. The article is well-sourced by reliable sources. A spot check of references looks good. Copyvio check looks good.

3. Broad The article is broad in its coverage of both the song selection and Eurovision contests.

4. Neutral The article is neutral.

5. Stable The edit history shows the article is stable.

6. Illustrated Images are all free, relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

@Grk1011: There are only a few prose issues to correct. The rest of the article looks ready for GA status. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

@Riley1012: Thank you for the review! I made the changes you listed and did a full re-read of the article to catch anything else. Should be all set! Grk1011 (talk) 23:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, the changes look good to me! -Riley1012 (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.