Talk:Greatness

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mystery mustache man in topic Nietzsche's relevance to article.

What's the deal with entries for Julian A Cooney & Chris VanGlahn on the page for Greatness?

Sjagadish (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Nietzsche's relevance to article. edit

The works of Nietzsche seem relevant to this article, But I am hesitant to add anything since I am unsure where to put it.Mystery mustache man (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

2007-02-24 Automated pywikipediabot message edit

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lists of great things edit

There's little that can go here without violating WP:NPOV. As the article says, "greatness" is too subjective. Merely being the biggest, first, etc., doesn't necessarily denote greatness; mere superlatives won't cut it. Even being a wonder doesn't automatically mean "great", IMHO. References to lists by non-Wikpedians that attept to subjectively categorize greatness may be suitable to catalog here. Any list by a Wikipedian by it's very nature must violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. --Kbh3rdtalk 03:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

List of GT 2 edit

I think someone meant "Jackie Chan," not "Jonny Chan." Oh, well. Basketballoneten 01:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply